Committee of Adjustment application · Consent (severance) (CO)
Committee of Adjustment application B0018/19NY
- Status
- Closed
- Approved
- Submitted
- 1 May 2019
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Consent (severance) (CO)
- Addresses
- 1090 Don Mills Rd
- Ward
- Ward 16 · Jon Burnside
- Submitted
- 1 May 2019
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Hearing date
- 12 September 2019
- Decision
- Approved
- Objection at the hearing
- Not recorded
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
To obtain consent to sever the property for the purpose of a lot addition and to establish an easement/right-of-way, in order to facilitate a mixed-use development at 169 The Donway West (the "Development Site"). Related planning files include City File No. 15 227717 NNY 25 OZ and LPAT Case No. PL160225 and File Nos. PL160225 and PL160334. In its decision, dated February 5, 2019, the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal approved a mixed-use development on the Development Site composed of a 25-storey tower with a mid-rise element atop a shared 3-storey podium, public open space, a park and outdoor amenity areas. In order to consolidate the lands that form the Development Site, a consent is required to transfer the Conveyed Lands to 169 The Donway West. No variance is required as a result of this consent application.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Don Mills Residents IncSM13795 · 15 November 2009 · “1090 Don Mills Rd”
- The Cadillac Fairview Corporation LimitedSM13540 · 29 September 2009 · “1090 Don Mills Rd”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.