Committee of Adjustment application · Consent (severance) (CO)

Committee of Adjustment application B0010/21NY

Ward 16 · Jon BurnsideDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Approved
Submitted: 22 February 2021; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Consent (severance) (CO)
Addresses: 844 Don Mills Rd
Ward: Ward 16 · Jon Burnside
Submitted: 22 February 2021
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Approved
Hearing date: 14 May 2021
Decision: Approved
Objection at the hearing: No
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

To obtain consent to create an easement/right-of-way. The proposed Easement will permit the installation, operation and maintenance of a temporary sewer line until permanent connections can be made to municipal services. Related planning files include By-law No. 1214-2019(LPAT), 16 236405 NNY 26 SB, 19 206988 NNY 16 SA, 14 153614 NNY 26 OZ (OPA), and 16 236387 NNY 26 OZ (ZBA).

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Don Mills (ARH) Homes Ltd.
SM34566 · 15 June 2023 · “844 Don Mills Road”
Aspen Ridge Homes
SM27646 · 14 February 2019 · “844 Don Mills Rd.”
Diamondcorp
SM24272 · 27 March 2017 · “844 Don Mills Road”
Whitecastle New Urban Fund 3
SM22668 · 15 January 2016 · “844 Don Mills Road”
Diamondcorp
SM21669 · 14 April 2015 · “844 Don Mills Road”
Diamondcorp
SM21606 · 29 March 2015 · “844 Don Mills Road”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide

26 lobbied · 179 matched

Median days

Lobbied184
Matched, unlobbied115

Approval rate

Lobbied79% n=24
Matched, unlobbied88% n=133

Refusal rate

Lobbied21%
Matched, unlobbied12%

Appeal rate

Lobbied15%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Objection rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied25%

Data table· 2 rows

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide: 26 lobbied and 179 matched unlobbied applications in 21 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	26	184	79% (n=24)	21%	15%	25%
Matched, unlobbied	179	115	88% (n=133)	12%	3%	25%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.