Committee of Adjustment application · Consent (severance) (CO)
Committee of Adjustment application B0002/21SC
- Status
- Closed
- Approved
- Submitted
- 23 December 2020
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Consent (severance) (CO)
- Addresses
- 24 August Ave
- Ward
- Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
- Submitted
- 23 December 2020
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Hearing date
- 10 March 2022
- Decision
- Approved
- Objection at the hearing
- Not recorded
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
To obtain a consent to sever and lot additions for two properties (24 August Avenue and 26 August Avenue) to create three residential lots. Each lot is to be developed with a new detached dwelling. Applications for consent B0002/21SC, B0003/21SC and minor variance applications A0005/21SC, A0006/21SC, A0007/21/SC are to be considered jointly by the Committee of Adjustment. The minor variance applications are seeking relief to the existing Zoning By-law to permit the construction of the proposed dwellings. NOTE: There are no associated variances to the Zoning By-law for lot frontages and lot areas.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.