Committee of Adjustment application · Consent (severance) (CO)
Committee of Adjustment application B0001/25SC
- Status
- Closed
- Approved
- Submitted
- 24 December 2024
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Consent (severance) (CO)
- Addresses
- 253 Markham Rd
- Ward
- Ward 24 · Paul Ainslie
- Submitted
- 24 December 2024
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Hearing date
- 12 February 2025
- Decision
- Approved
- Objection at the hearing
- Not recorded
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
To sever the property into two lots and create reciprocal easements. Cross Reference Site Plan Application No. 21 250217 ESC 24 SA.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Options for HomesSM35742 · 10 July 2024 · “253 Markham Road”
- Options for HomesSM31233 · 2 February 2021 · “253 Markham Road”
- Options For Homes Non-Profit CorporationSM26883 · 23 October 2018 · “253 Markham Road”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.