Committee of Adjustment application · Minor variance (MV)
Committee of Adjustment application A0671/23TEY
- Status
- Approved with Conditions
- Approved
- Submitted
- 19 July 2023
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Minor variance (MV)
- Addresses
- 6 Dawes Rd
- Ward
- Ward 19 · Brad Bradford
- Submitted
- 19 July 2023
- Status
- Approved with Conditions
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Hearing date
- 25 October 2023
- Decision
- Approved
- Objection at the hearing
- Not recorded
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
To alter the development standards, as approved under Site Specific Zoning By-law 1176-2022(OLT), which include changes to the overall height, parking standards, and to permit washrooms within the mechanical penthouse, for Phase 1 (West Block) of the development.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- 6 Dawes Fitzrovia LP & Ontario Holdings Ltd.SM34150 · 7 February 2023 · “6 Dawes Road”
- Fitzrovia Residential Inc.SM33507 · 5 August 2022 · “6 Dawes Road”
- Slate Asset Management LPSM28050 · 18 April 2019 · “6 Dawes Road”
- Carlyle Communities Inc.SM27699 · 1 March 2019 · “6 Dawes Road.”
- Centron StorageSM24834 · 12 July 2017 · “6 Dawes Rd.”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 19
1 lobbied · 8 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.