Committee of Adjustment application · Minor variance (MV)
Committee of Adjustment application A0618/26TEY
- Status
- Hearing Scheduled
- In progress
- Submitted
- 21 August 2026
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Minor variance (MV)
- Addresses
- 2151 Gerrard St E
- Ward
- Ward 19 · Brad Bradford
- Submitted
- 21 August 2026
- Status
- Hearing Scheduled
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Hearing date
- 14 October 2026
- Decision
- —
- Objection at the hearing
- Not recorded
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
To construct a new four-storey 16-unit apartment building with a front porch with stairs and an elevating device (platform lift), side (west) stairs and pedestrian ramp, and rear and side (east) second, third and fourth storey balconies. Also, to construct a new side (east) one-storey detached ancillary building (waste storage and mechanical room). There will be a total of 13 vehicular parking spaces, 3 motorcycle parking spaces, and 15 long-term and 5 short term bicycle parking spaces provided within a one-level below-grade garage with rear (south) access from the laneway. This current application is necessitated to correct and include variances not identified in the recently approved Minor Variance Decision A0055/26TEY for a four-storey 16-unit apartment building, as well as include additional variances related to the lot size reduction (City requested lane widening at the rear of the lot), below-grade garage, side (west) ramp, and front elevating device (platform lift).
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 19
1 lobbied · 8 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.