lobbyTO

Committee of Adjustment application · Minor variance (MV)

Committee of Adjustment application A0593/26TEY

334 Donlands Ave

Status
Postponed
In progress
Submitted
13 August 2026
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
0
None published
Communications on linked registrations
0

Application record

Type
Minor variance (MV)
Addresses
334 Donlands Ave
Ward
Ward 14 · Paula Fletcher
Submitted
13 August 2026
Status
Postponed
Outcome recorded
In progress
Hearing date
—
Decision
—
Objection at the hearing
Not recorded
Appealed
No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

To alter the existing two-and-one-half-storey detached mixed-use building (basement level is considered the first storey) by converting it into fully residential use, with two basement walkouts at the north and south-west corner, and an exterior west side staircase connecting the ground level to the south side second storey terrace. Also, there will be a total of two rear car parking spaces (one accessible parking space), 16 bicycle parking spaces (12 long-term at the basement level and four short-term in the rear yard), and seven exterior bins in the rear yard. There will be a total of 24 residential dwelling units, consisting of 19 studio units, four one-bedroom units, and one two-bedroom unit on this lot. This application is necessitated to legalize and to maintain the existing 11 dwelling units (currently 10 units proposed) on the main floor and conversion of office spaces into residential dwelling units at the basement level, which was constructed without an authorized building permit.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Minor variance (MV), Ward 14

4 lobbied · 69 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied126
  • Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

  • Lobbied75% n=154
  • Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied25%
  • Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied19%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

  • Lobbied43%
  • Matched, unlobbied27%
Data table· 4 rows
Minor variance (MV), Ward 14: 4 lobbied and 69 matched unlobbied applications in 4 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateObjection rate
Lobbied4Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied69Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateObjection rate
Lobbied17312675% (n=154)25%19%43%
Matched, unlobbied3,64611491% (n=3,058)9%4%27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.