Committee of Adjustment application · Minor variance (MV)
Committee of Adjustment application A0343/16SC
- Status
- Closed
- Refused
- Submitted
- 17 November 2016
- Appealed
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Minor variance (MV)
- Addresses
- 5131 Sheppard Ave E
- Ward
- Ward 23 · Jamaal Myers
- Submitted
- 17 November 2016
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Refused
- Hearing date
- 16 March 2017
- Decision
- Refused
- Objection at the hearing
- Not recorded
- Appealed
- Yes
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
This application is for variances for a proposed residential development with four 3-storey stacked townhouse buildings and three 6-storey apartment buildings, connected by one level of underground parking on vacant land on the east side of Markham Road, between Sheppard Avenue E. and Orchid Place Drive. The proposed development would include a range of unit sizes, including family-sized units. This proposed development is also subject to Site Plan Control by the City of Toronto (File No. 16 153771 ESC 42 SA).
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 23
3 lobbied · 32 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 3 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 32 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.