Committee of Adjustment application · Minor variance (MV)
Committee of Adjustment application A0202/26TEY
- Status
- Closed
- Approved
- Submitted
- 17 March 2026
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Minor variance (MV)
- Addresses
- 139 Christie St
- Ward
- Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
- Submitted
- 17 March 2026
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Hearing date
- 27 May 2026
- Decision
- Approved
- Objection at the hearing
- Not recorded
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
To construct a new three-storey detached dwelling (houseplex) with a rear basement walkout, a front ground floor bay window a front ground floor covered garbage storage area and front planter box, a side (north) yard main entrance on the ground floor, the second and third floors of the side (north) portion of the dwelling will be cantilevered with a canopy, three rear platforms (stair landings on all three levels) with rear exterior staircases (leading to all levels). Also, to construct a new rear two-storey detached ancillary building (laneway suite) containing one residential dwelling unit abutting the laneway with canopies at the front (west) and rear (east) sides of the laneway suite. There will be a total of five residential dwelling units on this lot (four units within the main detached dwelling and one unit within the laneway suite).
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 11
16 lobbied · 354 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 354 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.