Committee of Adjustment application · Minor variance (MV)

Committee of Adjustment application A0104/25NY

1150 Eglinton Ave E

Ward 16 · Jon BurnsideDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Approved
Submitted: 20 February 2025; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Minor variance (MV)
Addresses: 1150 Eglinton Ave E
Ward: Ward 16 · Jon Burnside
Submitted: 20 February 2025
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Approved
Hearing date: 17 April 2025
Decision: Approved
Objection at the hearing: Not recorded
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

To propose a 32-storey residential building that includes 908 residential parking spaces and 67 visitor parking spaces.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Aspen Ridge Homes
SM27646 · 14 February 2019 · “1150 Eglinton Ave. East”
Diamondcorp
SM24272 · 27 March 2017 · “1150 Eglinton Ave East.”
Whitecastle New Urban Fund 3
SM22668 · 15 January 2016 · “1150 Eglinton Avenue East”
Diamondcorp
SM21669 · 14 April 2015 · “1150 Eglinton Avenue East”
Diamondcorp
SM21606 · 29 March 2015 · “1150 Eglinton Avenue East.”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Minor variance (MV), Ward 16

5 lobbied · 35 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 16: 5 lobbied and 35 matched unlobbied applications in 4 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	5	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	35	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.