Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 26 226063 STE 11 OZ
208 Bloor St W; 210 Bloor St W
- Status
- Under Review
- In progress
- Submitted
- 26 August 2026
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 208 Bloor St W; 210 Bloor St W
- Ward
- Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
- Submitted
- 26 August 2026
- Status
- Under Review
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 426 units; 27,742 m² gross floor area
- Related file
- 21 126531 STE 11 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Proposed redevelopment of the lands with a 36-storey Private Student Residence (112.58 metres in height, including the mechanical penthouse) with 426 dwelling units.27,742 square metres of residential GFA and 220 square metres of non-residential GFA are proposed.4 visitor parking spaces (including 1 accessible space) and 235 bike parking spaces are proposed.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- 208 Bloor Street West LimitedSM34195 · 14 February 2023 · “208 Bloor Street West”
- ResidentSM33899 · 24 November 2022 · “208 Bloor Street West”
- Plaza PartnersSM31805 · 16 April 2021 · “208 Bloor Street West”
- Tribute CommunitiesSM25504 · 11 January 2018 · “210 Bloor Street West”
- Tribute CommunitiesSM25467 · 1 January 2018 · “210 Bloor Street West.”
- Tribute CommunitiesSM25468 · 21 December 2017 · “210 Bloor Street West”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11
69 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 69 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.