Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 26 185171 NNY 17 OZ
1 Burleigh Heights Dr; 3057 Bayview Ave; 3059 Bayview Ave; 3061 Bayview Ave; 3063 Bayview Ave; 3065 Bayview Ave; 3067 Bayview Ave
- Status
- Under Review
- In progress
- Submitted
- 16 June 2026
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 1 Burleigh Heights Dr; 3057 Bayview Ave; 3059 Bayview Ave; 3061 Bayview Ave; 3063 Bayview Ave; 3065 Bayview Ave; 3067 Bayview Ave
- Ward
- Ward 17 · Shelley Carroll
- Submitted
- 16 June 2026
- Status
- Under Review
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 155 units; 12,334 m² gross floor area
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Rezoning Application proposes the development of a 6-storey residential building. The building will provide a total of 155 residential units, being a mix of 1-bedroom, 2-bedroom, and 3-bedroom units. A paved access from Burleigh Heights Drive will be provided, leading to 1 level of below grade parking, providing a total of 115 parking spaces; as well as 133 bicycle parking spaces. The proposed development provides a total GFA of 12,334.40 square metres and a FSI of 3.12. Additionally, the proposed development provides 327 square metres of indoor amenity space and 310 square metres of outdoor amenity space.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 17
13 lobbied · 16 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 13 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.