Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 26 128829 NNY 06 OZ
- Status
- Under Review
- In progress
- Submitted
- 12 March 2026
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 570 Wilson Ave
- Ward
- Ward 6 · James Pasternak
- Submitted
- 12 March 2026
- Status
- Under Review
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 9 units; 705,280 m² gross floor area
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Rezoning application and district plan to permit a mixed-use development with a GFA of 705,280 square metres, including 635,780 square metres residential GFA (9,52 9 dwelling units) and 69,500 square metres non-residential GFA comprising 13,471 square metres retail, 24,505 square metres office and 31,524 square metres institutional with a density of 3.9 FSI and proposed building heights up to 63 storeys (195 metres). 10% of the residential GFA is proposed to be provided as affordable housing. The proposal includes five new local streets, two parks (total 16,300 square metres), and 4 privately-owned publicly accessible spaces. Proposed non-residential uses include a JK-Grade 8 TDSB school, district library, 3 childcare facilities, 929 square metres of community space, retail/commercial uses, a cultural destination, an office building, and a hotel.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 6
13 lobbied · 16 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 13 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.