Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 26 124313 ESC 22 OZ
- Status
- Under Review
- In progress
- Submitted
- 3 March 2026
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 3101 Kennedy Rd
- Ward
- Ward 22 · Nick Mantas
- Submitted
- 3 March 2026
- Status
- Under Review
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 4,877 m² gross floor area
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
The subject site has been developed as a single-storey commercial plaza comprised of four buildings with a total gross floor area of 4,877 square metres. The buildings have been recently completed and will be occupied by a mix of retail, restaurant and service commercial uses. The proposed Official Plan Amendment would redesignate the easterly portion of the subject lands from Core Employment Areas to General Employment Areas and would introduce a Site and Area Specific Policy (SASP) applicable to the subject site. The SASP would permit retail and service commercial uses across the entirety of the site, which is currently split designated as Core Employment Areas and General Employment Areas by the City of Toronto Official Plan. The SASP would also prohibit major retail developments of 6,000 square metres or more of gross floor area.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Huifeng Canada Inc.SM37720 · 15 June 2026 · “3101 Kennedy Rd”
- 3101 Kennedy Development Inc.SM22621 · 5 January 2016 · “3101 Kennedy Road”
- Scrilion Developments Inc.SM12650 · 12 January 2009 · “3101 kennedy road”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 22
6 lobbied · 10 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 6 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 10 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.