Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 26 115551 ESC 24 OZ

Ward 24 · Paul AinslieDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Under Review; In progress
Submitted: 10 February 2026; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 0 Corporate Dr; 85 Corporate Dr
Ward: Ward 24 · Paul Ainslie
Submitted: 10 February 2026
Status: Under Review
Outcome recorded: In progress
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 2,424 units; 160,204 m² gross floor area

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Proposal of five residential/mixed-use buildings, with heights of 48 storeys (Building D1), 46 storeys (Building D2), 44 storeys (Building D3) and 42 storeys (Building D4), as well as a 12-storey mid-rise building (Building D5). Total 2,424 residential units, gross floor area (GFA) of 160,204 square metres, comprised of 158,567 square metres of residential GFA and 1,637 square metres of non-residential GFA, resulting in a density of 7.21 FSI. Providing a 1,854.7 square metre new public park, a 2,362 square metre conveyance to the TRCA along the East Highland Creek, and a 401 square metre daycare facility.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Downsview Metro Devco
SM37154 · 14 November 2025 · “85 Corporate Drive”
Downsview Metro Devco
SM37155 · 14 November 2025 · “85 Corporate Drive”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 24

8 lobbied · 7 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 24: 8 lobbied and 7 matched unlobbied applications in 5 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	8	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	7	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.