Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 26 114412 WET 07 OZ
- Status
- Under Review
- In progress
- Submitted
- 6 February 2026
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 2450 Finch Ave W
- Ward
- Ward 7 · Anthony Perruzza
- Submitted
- 6 February 2026
- Status
- Under Review
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 1,136 units; 68,760 m² gross floor area
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Official Plan and Zoning By-Law Amendment application that proposes to redesignate the subject site from "Regeneration Areas" to "Mixed Use Areas", and permit two mixed-use buildings with heights of 44 storeys (Building A), and 47 storeys (Building B), inclusive of independent 6-storey podiums for each building. The existing one-storey commercial building on the subject site is not proposed to be retained. The proposed buildings would have a total gross-floor-area (GFA) of approximately 75,165 square metres, comprised of 68,760 square metres of residential GFA and 6,405 square metres of non-residential GFA. The residential component proposes 1,136 dwelling units. The proposed non-residential component includes a mix of childcare space, a grocery store, and retail and service commercial space. One level of underground parking is proposed that would be shared between Building A and Building B with 220 vehicle parking spaces. The application also proposes 993 square metres of parkland dedication, located at the southwest corner of the subject site. Independent of the proposed parkland dedication area is a proposed 10-metre natural buffer area along the entirety of the west lot line, adjacent to Duncanwoods Greenbelt.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- 2450 Finch Avenue West Inc.SM32512 · 1 November 2021 · “2450 Finch Avenue West.”
- 2450 Finch Avenue West Inc.SM32475 · 25 October 2021 · “2450 Finch Avenue West”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 7
7 lobbied · 8 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 7 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.