lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 26 114412 WET 07 OZ

2450 Finch Ave W

Status
Under Review
In progress
Submitted
6 February 2026
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
0
None published
Communications on linked registrations
0

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
2450 Finch Ave W
Ward
Ward 7 · Anthony Perruzza
Submitted
6 February 2026
Status
Under Review
Outcome recorded
In progress
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
1,136 units; 68,760 m² gross floor area

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Official Plan and Zoning By-Law Amendment application that proposes to redesignate the subject site from "Regeneration Areas" to "Mixed Use Areas", and permit two mixed-use buildings with heights of 44 storeys (Building A), and 47 storeys (Building B), inclusive of independent 6-storey podiums for each building. The existing one-storey commercial building on the subject site is not proposed to be retained. The proposed buildings would have a total gross-floor-area (GFA) of approximately 75,165 square metres, comprised of 68,760 square metres of residential GFA and 6,405 square metres of non-residential GFA. The residential component proposes 1,136 dwelling units. The proposed non-residential component includes a mix of childcare space, a grocery store, and retail and service commercial space. One level of underground parking is proposed that would be shared between Building A and Building B with 220 vehicle parking spaces. The application also proposes 993 square metres of parkland dedication, located at the southwest corner of the subject site. Independent of the proposed parkland dedication area is a proposed 10-metre natural buffer area along the entirety of the west lot line, adjacent to Duncanwoods Greenbelt.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 7

7 lobbied · 8 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied1,925
  • Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=64
  • Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied13%
  • Matched, unlobbied13%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 7: 7 lobbied and 8 matched unlobbied applications in 7 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied7Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied8Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied5731,925100% (n=64)0%13%0.08
Matched, unlobbied7631,79398% (n=70)2%13%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.