Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 25 271127 NNY 15 OZ
2437 Bayview Ave; 2439 Bayview Ave; 2441 Bayview Ave
- Status
- Application Received
- In progress
- Submitted
- 31 December 2025
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 2437 Bayview Ave; 2439 Bayview Ave; 2441 Bayview Ave
- Ward
- Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
- Submitted
- 31 December 2025
- Status
- Application Received
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
OPA & Rezonig. Proposes to redevelop 2441 Bayview Avenue with a 6-storey residential building, 2439 Bayview Avenue with a 6-storey private school, while proposing a minor addition to the existing building of Place of Worship at 2437 Bayview Avenue.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Chabad on BayviewSM36585 · 28 April 2025 · “2437 Bayview Avenue”
- Chabad on BayviewSM36587 · 28 April 2025 · “2437 Bayview Avenue”
- Chabad on BayviewSM36589 · 28 April 2025 · “2437 Bayview Avenue”
- Bannockburn SchoolSM28133 · 6 May 2019 · “2441 Bayview Avenue”
- Roy MasoumiSM21964 · 18 June 2015 · “2437 Bayview Avenue”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 15
20 lobbied · 36 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 15% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 36 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 30% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.