Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 25 265180 STE 13 OZ
1 Mount Pleasant Rd; 30 Huntley St; 32 Huntley St; 34 Huntley St; 38 Huntley St; 40 Huntley St; 112 Isabella St; 114 Isabella St; 116 Isabella St; 118 Isabella St; 120 Isabella St; 122 Isabella St; 124 Isabella St
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 11 December 2025
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 1 Mount Pleasant Rd; 30 Huntley St; 32 Huntley St; 34 Huntley St; 38 Huntley St; 40 Huntley St; 112 Isabella St; 114 Isabella St; 116 Isabella St; 118 Isabella St; 120 Isabella St; 122 Isabella St; 124 Isabella St
- Ward
- Ward 13 · Chris Moise
- Submitted
- 11 December 2025
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 1,419 units
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
To permit two buildings, 56 and 60 storeys, with approximately 1,419 purpose-built rental units, including 32 rental replacement units. The project retains portions of the existing listed buildings at 122-124 Isabella Street, 30-32 Huntley Street, and 38-40 Huntley Street. The applicant also include a portion of 1 Mount Pleasant Road.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Rogers CommunicationsSM20250 · 31 March 2014 · “34 Huntley Street”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13
83 lobbied · 97 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 83 | — | 100% (n=10) | 0% | 11% | 0.14 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 97 | 1,793 | 93% (n=14) | 7% | 17% | 0.08 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.