Development application · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
Development application 25 257737 NNY 16 CD
844 Don Mills Rd; 1150 Eglinton Ave E
- Status
- Draft Plan Approved
- Approved
- Submitted
- 24 November 2025
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
- Addresses
- 844 Don Mills Rd; 1150 Eglinton Ave E
- Ward
- Ward 16 · Jon Burnside
- Submitted
- 24 November 2025
- Status
- Draft Plan Approved
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 80 units
- Related file
- 21 243786 NNY 16 SA
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Draft Plan of Condominium Application to create 80 new units.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Don Mills (ARH) Homes Ltd.SM34566 · 15 June 2023 · “844 Don Mills Road”
- Aspen Ridge HomesSM27646 · 14 February 2019 · “1150 Eglinton Ave. East”
- Aspen Ridge HomesSM27646 · 14 February 2019 · “844 Don Mills Rd.”
- DiamondcorpSM24272 · 27 March 2017 · “1150 Eglinton Ave East.”
- DiamondcorpSM24272 · 27 March 2017 · “844 Don Mills Road”
- Whitecastle New Urban Fund 3SM22668 · 15 January 2016 · “1150 Eglinton Avenue East”
- Whitecastle New Urban Fund 3SM22668 · 15 January 2016 · “844 Don Mills Road”
- DiamondcorpSM21669 · 14 April 2015 · “1150 Eglinton Avenue East”
- DiamondcorpSM21669 · 14 April 2015 · “844 Don Mills Road”
- DiamondcorpSM21606 · 29 March 2015 · “1150 Eglinton Avenue East.”
- DiamondcorpSM21606 · 29 March 2015 · “844 Don Mills Road”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.