Development application · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
Development application 25 256303 NNY 15 CD
25 Frederick Todd Way; 939 Eglinton Ave E
- Status
- Draft Plan Approved
- Approved
- Submitted
- 20 November 2025
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
- Addresses
- 25 Frederick Todd Way; 939 Eglinton Ave E
- Ward
- Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
- Submitted
- 20 November 2025
- Status
- Draft Plan Approved
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 301 units
- Related file
- 21 139777 NNY 15 SA
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Draft Plan of Condo for 301 units.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Camrost-FelcorpSM27655 · 15 February 2019 · “939 Eglinton Avenue East”
- Upper Eastside Building Group Inc.SM26550 · 24 July 2018 · “939 Eglinton Avenue East”
- DiamondcorpSM24267 · 26 March 2017 · “939 Eglinton Avenue East”
- Whitecastle New Urban Fund 2SM22499 · 17 November 2015 · “939 Eglinton Avenue East”
- Whitecastle New Urban Fund 2SM18293 · 25 July 2012 · “939 Eglinton Avenue East”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.