lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 25 251661 NNY 08 OZ

1 Dorney Crt; 1-87 Bredonhill Crt; 2-8 Flemington Rd; 2A Flemington Rd; 3 Dorney Crt; 3 Leila Lane; 5 Dorney Crt; 5 Leila Lane; 7 Dorney Crt; 9 Dorney Crt; 11 Dorney Crt; 15 Dorney Crt; 17 Dorney Crt; 19 Dorney Crt; 21 Dorney Crt; 21 Varna Dr; 22 Varna Dr; 23 Dorney Crt; 23 Varna Dr; 25 Dorney Crt; 25 Varna Dr; 27 Dorney Crt; 27 Varna Dr; 29 Dorney Crt; 29 Varna Dr; 31 Bagot Crt; 31 Dorney Crt; 31 Varna Dr; 33 Bagot Crt; 33 Dorney Crt; 33 Varna Dr; 35 Bagot Crt; 35 Dorney Crt; 35 Varna Dr; 37 Bagot Crt; 37 Dorney Crt; 37 Varna Dr; 39 Bagot Crt; 39 Dorney Crt; 39 Varna Dr; 41 Bagot Crt; 41 Dorney Crt; 43 Bagot Crt; 43 Dorney Crt; 45 Bagot Crt; 45 Dorney Crt; 47 Bagot Crt; 47 Dorney Crt; 49 Bagot Crt; 49 Dorney Crt; 51 Bagot Crt; 51 Dorney Crt; 53 Bagot Crt; 53 Dorney Crt; 55 Bagot Crt; 55 Dorney Crt; 57 Bagot Crt; 57 Dorney Crt; 59 Bagot Crt; 59 Dorney Crt; 61 Bagot Crt; 61 Dorney Crt; 63 Bagot Crt; 63 Dorney Crt; 65 Bagot Crt; 65 Dorney Crt; 67 Bagot Crt; 67 Dorney Crt; 69 Bagot Crt; 69 Dorney Crt; 71 Bagot Crt; 71 Dorney Crt; 73 Bagot Crt; 73 Dorney Crt; 75 Bagot Crt; 75 Dorney Crt; 77 Bagot Crt; 77 Dorney Crt; 79 Bagot Crt; 79 Dorney Crt; 81 Bagot Crt; 81 Dorney Crt; 83 Bagot Crt; 83 Dorney Crt; 85 Bagot Crt; 85 Dorney Crt; 87 Bagot Crt; 87 Dorney Crt; 89 Bagot Crt; 89 Dorney Crt; 91 Bagot Crt; 91 Dorney Crt; 93 Bagot Crt; 93 Dorney Crt; 95 Bagot Crt; 95 Dorney Crt; 97 Bagot Crt; 97 Dorney Crt; 99 Bagot Crt; 101 Bagot Crt; 103 Bagot Crt; 105 Bagot Crt; 107 Bagot Crt; 109 Bagot Crt

Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
10 November 2025
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
0
None published
Communications on linked registrations
0

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
1 Dorney Crt; 1-87 Bredonhill Crt; 2-8 Flemington Rd; 2A Flemington Rd; 3 Dorney Crt; 3 Leila Lane; 5 Dorney Crt; 5 Leila Lane; 7 Dorney Crt; 9 Dorney Crt; 11 Dorney Crt; 15 Dorney Crt; 17 Dorney Crt; 19 Dorney Crt; 21 Dorney Crt; 21 Varna Dr; 22 Varna Dr; 23 Dorney Crt; 23 Varna Dr; 25 Dorney Crt; 25 Varna Dr; 27 Dorney Crt; 27 Varna Dr; 29 Dorney Crt; 29 Varna Dr; 31 Bagot Crt; 31 Dorney Crt; 31 Varna Dr; 33 Bagot Crt; 33 Dorney Crt; 33 Varna Dr; 35 Bagot Crt; 35 Dorney Crt; 35 Varna Dr; 37 Bagot Crt; 37 Dorney Crt; 37 Varna Dr; 39 Bagot Crt; 39 Dorney Crt; 39 Varna Dr; 41 Bagot Crt; 41 Dorney Crt; 43 Bagot Crt; 43 Dorney Crt; 45 Bagot Crt; 45 Dorney Crt; 47 Bagot Crt; 47 Dorney Crt; 49 Bagot Crt; 49 Dorney Crt; 51 Bagot Crt; 51 Dorney Crt; 53 Bagot Crt; 53 Dorney Crt; 55 Bagot Crt; 55 Dorney Crt; 57 Bagot Crt; 57 Dorney Crt; 59 Bagot Crt; 59 Dorney Crt; 61 Bagot Crt; 61 Dorney Crt; 63 Bagot Crt; 63 Dorney Crt; 65 Bagot Crt; 65 Dorney Crt; 67 Bagot Crt; 67 Dorney Crt; 69 Bagot Crt; 69 Dorney Crt; 71 Bagot Crt; 71 Dorney Crt; 73 Bagot Crt; 73 Dorney Crt; 75 Bagot Crt; 75 Dorney Crt; 77 Bagot Crt; 77 Dorney Crt; 79 Bagot Crt; 79 Dorney Crt; 81 Bagot Crt; 81 Dorney Crt; 83 Bagot Crt; 83 Dorney Crt; 85 Bagot Crt; 85 Dorney Crt; 87 Bagot Crt; 87 Dorney Crt; 89 Bagot Crt; 89 Dorney Crt; 91 Bagot Crt; 91 Dorney Crt; 93 Bagot Crt; 93 Dorney Crt; 95 Bagot Crt; 95 Dorney Crt; 97 Bagot Crt; 97 Dorney Crt; 99 Bagot Crt; 101 Bagot Crt; 103 Bagot Crt; 105 Bagot Crt; 107 Bagot Crt; 109 Bagot Crt
Ward
Ward 8 · Mike Colle
Submitted
10 November 2025
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
961 units
Related file
241-2026 and 262-2026

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

OPA & Rezoning Application proposes Phase 2 of the TCHC Lawrence Heights revitilization, including new and reconfigured public streets, public parks and community uses, and residential development ranging from 6 to 29 storeys in height. Phase 2 includes the replacement of 213 Phase 2 social housing units, 64 replacement units from Phase 4, and the creation of 180 new TCHC affordable units and 961 market units (total of 1,748 dewlling units).

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8

33 lobbied · 57 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=2
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=3

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied12%
  • Matched, unlobbied27%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied1,925
  • Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=64
  • Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied13%
  • Matched, unlobbied13%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8: 33 lobbied and 57 matched unlobbied applications in 22 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied33—100% (n=2)0%12%0.00
Matched, unlobbied57—100% (n=3)0%27%0.03
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied5731,925100% (n=64)0%13%0.08
Matched, unlobbied7631,79398% (n=70)2%13%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.