Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 25 242829 STE 13 SA
1 Sumach St; 2A Sumach St; 4 Sumach St; 6 Sumach St; 8 Sumach St; 10 Sumach St; 12 Sumach St; 14 Sumach St; 16 Sumach St; 90 Eastern Ave
- Status
- Under Review
- In progress
- Submitted
- 21 October 2025
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 1 Sumach St; 2A Sumach St; 4 Sumach St; 6 Sumach St; 8 Sumach St; 10 Sumach St; 12 Sumach St; 14 Sumach St; 16 Sumach St; 90 Eastern Ave
- Ward
- Ward 13 · Chris Moise
- Submitted
- 21 October 2025
- Status
- Under Review
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 1,284 units; 1,662 m² gross floor area
- Related file
- 21 204556 STE 13 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Site Plan Control Application to facilitate the development of the site with two mixed use buildings: 59 and 55 storeys, containing 1,284 dwelling units and 1,662 square metres of non-residential gross floor area.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Block Developments Inc.SM34564 · 16 June 2023 · “1 Sumach St”
- Block Developments Inc.SM34267 · 3 March 2023 · “1 Sumach St”
- Block Developments Inc.SM34268 · 3 March 2023 · “1 Sumach St”
- Thelo GroupSM29035 · 22 October 2019 · “1 Sumach Street.”
- Taso BoussoulasSM26602 · 14 August 2018 · “1 Sumach St”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13
56 lobbied · 128 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 56 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 7% | 0.16 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 128 | — | 100% (n=8) | 0% | 2% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.