Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 25 222465 STE 04 OZ
21 Oakmount Rd; 21A Oakmount Rd; 23 Oakmount Rd; 25 Oakmount Rd; 26 Mountview Ave; 27 Oakmount Rd; 28 Mountview Ave; 29 Oakmount Rd; 30 Mountview Ave; 32 Mountview Ave; 34 Mountview Ave; 36 Mountview Ave
- Status
- Appeal Received
- In progress
- Submitted
- 9 September 2025
- Appealed
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 21 Oakmount Rd; 21A Oakmount Rd; 23 Oakmount Rd; 25 Oakmount Rd; 26 Mountview Ave; 27 Oakmount Rd; 28 Mountview Ave; 29 Oakmount Rd; 30 Mountview Ave; 32 Mountview Ave; 34 Mountview Ave; 36 Mountview Ave
- Ward
- Ward 4 · Gord Perks
- Submitted
- 9 September 2025
- Status
- Appeal Received
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- Yes
- Size stated in the description
- 61,378 m² gross floor area
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Combined Official Plan & Zoning By-law Amendment application for two residential tall buildings (41-storey and 39-storey respectively) with a 6-storey podium. The proposed development contemplates a total of 873 (including 11 rental replacement units) and 61,378 square metres of total gross floor area at 26 to 36 Mountview Avenue and 21 to 29 Oakmount Road.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 4
12 lobbied · 20 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 12 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 20 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.