Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 25 222153 WET 05 OZ
70 Brownville Ave; 72 Brownville Ave; 74 Brownville Ave; 76 Brownville Ave; 80 Brownville Ave; 82 Brownville Ave; 84 Brownville Ave; 86 Brownville Ave; 88 Brownville Ave; 90 Brownville Ave; 92 Brownville Ave; 94 Brownville Ave; 96 Brownville Ave; 98 Brownville Ave; 100 Brownville Ave; 102 Brownville Ave; 104 Brownville Ave
- Status
- Under Review
- In progress
- Submitted
- 8 September 2025
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 70 Brownville Ave; 72 Brownville Ave; 74 Brownville Ave; 76 Brownville Ave; 80 Brownville Ave; 82 Brownville Ave; 84 Brownville Ave; 86 Brownville Ave; 88 Brownville Ave; 90 Brownville Ave; 92 Brownville Ave; 94 Brownville Ave; 96 Brownville Ave; 98 Brownville Ave; 100 Brownville Ave; 102 Brownville Ave; 104 Brownville Ave
- Ward
- Ward 5 · Frances Nunziata
- Submitted
- 8 September 2025
- Status
- Under Review
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
The proposal development consists of a residential high-rise development consisting of two towers (43 and 41 Storeys) within one connected building through a 6 storey podium. The 43-storey tower (Tower B) will be located on the north portion of the Subject Property, with the 41-storey tower (Tower A) on the south.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 5
12 lobbied · 17 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 12 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.