Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 25 198723 NNY 08 OZ
2 Romar Cres; 4 Romar Cres; 6 Romar Cres; 265 Viewmount Ave; 269 Viewmount Ave; 351 Marlee Ave; 353 Marlee Ave; 355 Marlee Ave; 357 Marlee Ave; 359 Marlee Ave; 361 Marlee Ave; 363 Marlee Ave; 365 Marlee Ave; 367 Marlee Ave; 369 Marlee Ave; 371 Marlee Ave; 373 Marlee Ave; 375 Marlee Ave; 377 Marlee Ave
- Status
- OMB Appeal
- In progress
- Submitted
- 23 July 2025
- Appealed
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 2 Romar Cres; 4 Romar Cres; 6 Romar Cres; 265 Viewmount Ave; 269 Viewmount Ave; 351 Marlee Ave; 353 Marlee Ave; 355 Marlee Ave; 357 Marlee Ave; 359 Marlee Ave; 361 Marlee Ave; 363 Marlee Ave; 365 Marlee Ave; 367 Marlee Ave; 369 Marlee Ave; 371 Marlee Ave; 373 Marlee Ave; 375 Marlee Ave; 377 Marlee Ave
- Ward
- Ward 8 · Mike Colle
- Submitted
- 23 July 2025
- Status
- OMB Appeal
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- Yes
- Size stated in the description
- 840 units; 58,447 m² gross floor area
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment to permit a mixed-use development consisting of 37-storey (124.8m + 6m MPH) and 39-storey (131.1m + 6m MPH) towers on 6-storey podiums. 840 residential units (including 26 rental replacement units), 228 vehicle parking spaces and 961 bicycle parking spaces are proposed. The total gross floor area (GFA) of 58,447 square metres results in a floor space index (FSI) of 11.06. 778 square metres of non-residential GFA,is also proposed, a portion of which will be designated as an in-kind benefit community agency space.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8
33 lobbied · 57 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 33 | — | 100% (n=2) | 0% | 12% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 57 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 27% | 0.03 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.