Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 25 180089 NNY 18 SA
2810 Bayview Ave; 2812 Bayview Ave; 2814 Bayview Ave; 2816 Bayview Ave
- Status
- Under Review
- In progress
- Submitted
- 19 June 2025
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 2810 Bayview Ave; 2812 Bayview Ave; 2814 Bayview Ave; 2816 Bayview Ave
- Ward
- Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
- Submitted
- 19 June 2025
- Status
- Under Review
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 477 units; 30,893 m² gross floor area
- Related file
- 24 185488 NNY 18 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Site Plan Control Application proposes the development of a 42-storey residential building. The building will provide a total of 477 rental residential units, being a mix of studio, 1-bedroom, 2-bedroom, and 3-bedrooms. A paved access from Irvington Cres along the west property line will be provided, leading to 3 levels of below-grade parking, providing a total of 133 parking spaces; as well as 181 bicycle parking spaces. The proposed development provides a total GFA of 30,893 square metres and a FSI of 13.28. Additionally, the proposed development provides 1,040 square metres of indoor amenity space and 582 square metres of outdoor amenity space.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 18
18 lobbied · 125 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 18 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 125 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.