Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 25 124181 ESC 20 OZ

5 Bellamy Rd S; 7 Bellamy Rd S; 9 Bellamy Rd S; 11 Bellamy Rd S

Ward 20 · Parthi KandavelDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 3 March 2025; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 5 Bellamy Rd S; 7 Bellamy Rd S; 9 Bellamy Rd S; 11 Bellamy Rd S
Ward: Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
Submitted: 3 March 2025
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 115 units; 15,026 m² gross floor area

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Rezoning application for a proposal consisting of 3 blocks of 4-storey back-to-back stacked condominium buildings consisting of 115 residential units and total GFA 15,026 sqm. The applicant had made an error and claimed the first submission contained 13,100 sqm (which was above grade only). Feb 20/26 Second submission is 3 blocks of 4 storey back to back stacked condominium buildings consisting of 110 residential units and a total GFA of 14,066 sqm.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 20

13 lobbied · 19 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 20: 13 lobbied and 19 matched unlobbied applications in 8 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	13	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	19	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.