Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 24 240873 ESC 20 SA
- Status
- Under Review
- In progress
- Submitted
- 19 November 2024
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 756 Warden Ave
- Ward
- Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
- Submitted
- 19 November 2024
- Status
- Under Review
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 6,921 m² gross floor area
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
The proposed development of this large vacant 24,254 square metre parcel of land at the southwest corner of Warden Avenue and Comstock Road involves the construction of a 2 storey (13 m) Charitiy Bingo Hall including electronic gaming, bowling alleys and a restaurant and bar. Overall, 6921 square metres of Gross Floor Area are proposed, and 382 autmomtobile and 30 biciyle parking spaces are proposed to be provided.This application is related to Minor Variance application No. A0206/23SC, which was refused at Committee of Adjustment, but successfully appealed at TLAB by the applicant. The Proposed development is a two storey (12.9 m, not including roof top mechanical units) Electronic Bingofacility, on an existing site that has not been developed.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Dolphin GamingSM35634 · 27 May 2024 · “756 Warden Avenue”
- Pantheon GroupSM22311 · 7 October 2015 · “756 Warden Avenue”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 20
11 lobbied · 34 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 11 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 34 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.