Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 24 204279 STE 09 OZ
137 Kirknewton Rd; 156 Dynevor Rd; 1875 Eglinton Ave W; 1877 Eglinton Ave W; 1879 Eglinton Ave W; 1881 Eglinton Ave W; 1883 Eglinton Ave W; 1885 Eglinton Ave W; 1887 Eglinton Ave W; 1889 Eglinton Ave W; 1891 Eglinton Ave W; 1893 Eglinton Ave W; 1895 Eglinton Ave W; 1897 Eglinton Ave W; 1901 Eglinton Ave W
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 27 August 2024
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 137 Kirknewton Rd; 156 Dynevor Rd; 1875 Eglinton Ave W; 1877 Eglinton Ave W; 1879 Eglinton Ave W; 1881 Eglinton Ave W; 1883 Eglinton Ave W; 1885 Eglinton Ave W; 1887 Eglinton Ave W; 1889 Eglinton Ave W; 1891 Eglinton Ave W; 1893 Eglinton Ave W; 1895 Eglinton Ave W; 1897 Eglinton Ave W; 1901 Eglinton Ave W
- Ward
- Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
- Submitted
- 27 August 2024
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 446 units
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Combined Official Plan & Zoning By-law Amendments for a 34-storey mixed-use building (excluding mechanical penthouse) with 446 residential dwelling units. The total Gross Floor Area is 33, 237 square metres, including 910 square metres of retail, 111 parking spaces with three levels of underground parking, a publicly accessible open space of over 100 square metres and a 6 metre public laneway on the south end of the site to be conveyed to the City.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 9
19 lobbied · 28 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 19 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 28 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.