Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 24 202418 WET 05 OZ

10 Victoria Ave E; 1693 Weston Rd; 1695 Weston Rd; 1705 Weston Rd

Ward 5 · Frances NunziataDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 22 August 2024; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 10 Victoria Ave E; 1693 Weston Rd; 1695 Weston Rd; 1705 Weston Rd
Ward: Ward 5 · Frances Nunziata
Submitted: 22 August 2024
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 559 units; 34,417 m² gross floor area
Related file: 17 278899 WET 11 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Proposed 43 storey building (146.4 metres including the mechanical penthouse), inclusive of a 6-storey base building. The proposal would have a total GFA of 34,417 square metres, including 473 square metres of retail GFA, and a density of 8.99 FSI. A total 559 residential units are proposed, including 15 rental replacement and 6 affordable units.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

1705 Weston Road Holdings Limited
SM30758 · 27 October 2020 · “1705 Weston Road”
Trinity Development Group Inc.
SM27124 · 4 December 2018 · “1705 Weston Road”
Oldstonehenge Development Corporation
SM25052 · 18 September 2017 · “1705 Weston Road”
Oldstonehenge
SM25010 · 7 September 2017 · “1705 Weston Road”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 5

12 lobbied · 17 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 5: 12 lobbied and 17 matched unlobbied applications in 9 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	12	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	17	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.