Development application · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
Development application 24 153246 WET 03 SB
- Status
- Draft Plan Approved
- Approved
- Submitted
- 23 May 2024
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
- Addresses
- 1025 The Queensway
- Ward
- Ward 3 · Amber Morley
- Submitted
- 23 May 2024
- Status
- Draft Plan Approved
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 4,222 units; 346,247 m² gross floor area
- Related file
- 24 153505 WET 03 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
June 5, 2024: Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision application to create the necessary blocks to support the proposed development.**Note associated Zoning By-law Amendment Application 24 153505 WET 03 OZ seeeking to permit the comprehensive redevelopment of the subject site with a new master planned complete community containing a central public park with a size of 4,286.4 square metres surrounded by two new public roads, ten mixed-use buildings with heights ranging from 18- to 46-storeys and two 7-storey employment use buildings. Collectively, the buildings contain a total of 4,222 dwelling units and a total gross floor area of 346,246.7 square metres, comprised of 291,074.2 square metres of residential gross floor area, 21,963 square metres of employment gross floor area and 2,524 square metres of retail and daycare gross floor area. The proposal will result in a density of 6.0 times the area of the lot.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 3
1 lobbied · 1 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.