Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 23 187327 STE 11 SA
- Status
- Under Review
- In progress
- Submitted
- 11 August 2023
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 80 Bloor St W; 82 Bloor St W
- Ward
- Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
- Submitted
- 11 August 2023
- Status
- Under Review
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 1,716 units
- Related file
- 13 248425 STE 27 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
78-storey mixed-use building with 952 square metres of retail space on the ground floor, 8,767 square metres of office space on second through fifth floors and 1,716 dwelling units above.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Northam Realty Advisors LimitedSM28593 · 17 July 2019 · “82 Bloor Street West”
- Yeung Chi Shing EstatesSM18273 · 17 July 2012 · “80 Bloor Street West”
- Yeung Chi Shing EstatesSM18289 · 17 July 2012 · “80 Bloor Street West”
- Yeung Chi Shing Estates Canada LimitedSM17214 · 27 September 2011 · “80 Bloor Street W”
- Krugarand CorporationSM11560 · 16 April 2008 · “80 Bloor Street West”
- Yeung Chi Shing Estates Canada LimitedSM11430 · 31 March 2008 · “80 Bloor Street W”
- Krugarand CorporationSM11432 · 25 March 2008 · “80 Bloor Street West”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11
46 lobbied · 113 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 46 | — | 100% (n=2) | 0% | 9% | 0.09 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 113 | 1,629 | 100% (n=12) | 0% | 2% | 0.02 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.