Development application · Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)
Development application 23 184502 NNY 18 PL
- Status
- Under Review
- In progress
- Submitted
- 4 August 2023
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)
- Addresses
- 57 Linelle St
- Ward
- Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
- Submitted
- 4 August 2023
- Status
- Under Review
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 34 units
- Related file
- 13 124500 NNY 23 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Part Lot Control Exemption to facilitate the creation of a residential townhouse block with 34 units on a common elements road. Related to Common Elements Condominium Application (23 184495 NNY 18 CD)
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- McCarthy Tetrault LLPSM24133 · 6 March 2017 · “57 Linelle Street.”
- Mattamy Homes LimitedSM23656 · 28 October 2016 · “57 Linelle Street”
- Park Lawn Company LimitedSM18909 · 5 February 2013 · “57 Linelle St.”
- Park Lawn Company LimitedSM18886 · 1 February 2013 · “57 Linelle St”
- Park Lawn Company LimitedSM18887 · 1 February 2013 · “57 Linelle St.”
- Park Lawn Company LimitedSM18278 · 18 July 2012 · “57 Linelle Street”
- Park Lawn Company LimitedSM18280 · 18 July 2012 · “57 Linelle Street”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Part Lot Control Exemption (PL), Ward 18
1 lobbied · 5 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Part Lot Control Exemption (PL), City-wide
2 lobbied · 6 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 5 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 6 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.