Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 23 182894 STE 12 OZ
10 Davisville Ave; 17 Millwood Rd; 21 Millwood Rd; 22 Davisville Ave; 1913 Yonge St; 1915 Yonge St; 1917 Yonge St; 1919 Yonge St; 1921 Yonge St; 1923 Yonge St; 1925 Yonge St; 1941 Yonge St; 1951 Yonge St
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 1 August 2023
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 10 Davisville Ave; 17 Millwood Rd; 21 Millwood Rd; 22 Davisville Ave; 1913 Yonge St; 1915 Yonge St; 1917 Yonge St; 1919 Yonge St; 1921 Yonge St; 1923 Yonge St; 1925 Yonge St; 1941 Yonge St; 1951 Yonge St
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Submitted
- 1 August 2023
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 20 191099 STE 12 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Application to Lift the 'H' from Zoning By-law
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Times Group CorporationSM34034 · 12 January 2023 · “1951 Yonge Street”
- Times Group CorporationSM34034 · 12 January 2023 · “21 Millwood Road”
- Times Group CorporationSM34034 · 12 January 2023 · “22 Davisville Avenue”
- Times Group CorporationSM23866 · 9 January 2017 · “1951 Yonge St.”
- Times Group CorporationSM17926 · 19 March 2012 · “1941 Yonge Street”
- Greey Realty Holdings LimitedSM16504 · 30 May 2011 · “21 Millwood Road”
- Greey Realty Holdings LimitedSM16468 · 25 May 2011 · “21 Millwood Road”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12
44 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 44 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 14% | 0.02 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.