Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 23 167778 STE 10 OZ
2 Small St; 200 Queens Quay E; 259 Lake Shore Blvd E; 291 Lake Shore Blvd E
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 29 June 2023
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 2 Small St; 200 Queens Quay E; 259 Lake Shore Blvd E; 291 Lake Shore Blvd E
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Submitted
- 29 June 2023
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 2,811 units
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Proposed Zoning By-law amendment for Quayside Blocks 1 & 2. The proposal includes 3 mixed-use residential towers (70, 64 and 55 storeys) and a 12-storey mid-rise building with 2,811 residential units, including 458 affordable units, 12,106 m2 of institutional space, and 1585 m2 retail space. The proposal includes space intended for an educational institution as well as a community hub with mental and physical health services and a private childcare facility. A 14,350 m2 east-west "Community Forest" open space is proposed between buildings on Blocks 1 & 2 and a rooftop urban farm is also proposed. An application is required to amend the former City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended by By-law 1049-2006, to permit additional height and density, amend the permitted uses, update zoning maps and revise certain zoning standards to permit the proposed development. This application forms part of the broader Quayside Master Plan with related planning applications at 333 Lake Shore Blvd E.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.