lobbyTO

Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 23 138797 WET 03 SA

27 Newcastle St; 29 Newcastle St; 33 Newcastle St; 33B Newcastle St; 39 Newcastle St

Ward 3 · Amber MorleyDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page
Status
Under Review
In progress
Submitted
27 April 2023
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
0
None published
Communications on linked registrations
0

Application record

Type
Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses
27 Newcastle St; 29 Newcastle St; 33 Newcastle St; 33B Newcastle St; 39 Newcastle St
Ward
Ward 3 · Amber Morley
Submitted
27 April 2023
Status
Under Review
Outcome recorded
In progress
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
1,351 units; 2,241 m² gross floor area
Related file
16 198950 WET 06 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Site Plan Application in relation to rezoning application file #16 198950 WET 06 OZ. This application proposes four apartment buildings (22, 30, 36, and 36 storeys) connected by a five-storey mixed-use base building to be constructed in two phases. Phase 1 will include integrated Metrolinx infrastructure for the GO Transit Station including a new station building, pedestrian pick-up drop-off (PPUDO) facility, transit plaza, and underground commuter parking. The proposed buildings (both phases combined) would have 1,351 residential units, 2,240.7 square metres of non-residential gross floor area, 614 car parking spaces underground (not including the 300 proposed Metrolinx parking spaces), and 1,056 bicycle parking spaces (not including the 66 proposed Metrolinx bicycle parking spaces).

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 3

24 lobbied · 100 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied—
  • Matched, unlobbied1,629

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=5
  • Matched, unlobbied70% n=10

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied30%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied4%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied—
  • Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=61
  • Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied4%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%
Data table· 4 rows
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 3: 24 lobbied and 100 matched unlobbied applications in 18 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied24—100% (n=5)0%4%0.25
Matched, unlobbied1001,62970% (n=10)30%4%0.14
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied449—100% (n=61)0%4%0.07
Matched, unlobbied1,23772797% (n=96)3%3%0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.