Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 22 207467 WET 07 SA
33 Walsh Ave; 35 Walsh Ave; 37 Walsh Ave; 39 Walsh Ave; 41 Walsh Ave; 43 Walsh Ave; 45 Walsh Ave; 47 Walsh Ave; 49 Walsh Ave; 51 Walsh Ave; 2717-2745 Weston Rd
- Status
- OMB Appeal
- In progress
- Submitted
- 22 September 2022
- Appealed
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 33 Walsh Ave; 35 Walsh Ave; 37 Walsh Ave; 39 Walsh Ave; 41 Walsh Ave; 43 Walsh Ave; 45 Walsh Ave; 47 Walsh Ave; 49 Walsh Ave; 51 Walsh Ave; 2717-2745 Weston Rd
- Ward
- Ward 7 · Anthony Perruzza
- Submitted
- 22 September 2022
- Status
- OMB Appeal
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- Yes
- Size stated in the description
- 2,670 units
- Related file
- 22 207468 WET 07 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
The application proposes six new towers and one new mid-rise ranging in height from 14-storeys to 34-storeys, with a total of 2,670 residential units and 1,000 square metres of at-grade retail space. A new L-shaped public road provides access to the site from Walsh Avenue in the north and from Wilson Avenue in the east. A private looped driveway extends from the public road to provide access to the site¿s underground parking entrances and at-grade pick-up and drop-off areas in the centre of the site. A new public park is proposed on the eastern side of the site with frontage onto Walsh Avenue, Wilson Avenue, and the new public road. A new outdoor amenity area is proposed in the centre of the site, and two mid-block connections with pedestrian access easements connect the centre of the site to adjacent public streets.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 7
5 lobbied · 28 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 5 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 28 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.