Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 22 168547 NNY 18 OZ

Ward 18 · Lily ChengDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Under Review; In progress
Submitted: 27 June 2022; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 5915 Yonge St
Ward: Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
Submitted: 27 June 2022
Status: Under Review
Outcome recorded: In progress
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 496 units; 38,997 m² gross floor area
Related file: 11 287471 NNY 24 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Official Plan Amendment and Rezoning Application for the 3rd phase of the Newtonbrook Plaza development. Proposal consisting of a 38-storey mixed-use tower with 496 dwelling units. Total gross floor area of 38,997.0 square metres, consisting of 34,782.0 square metres of residential GFA and 4,215.0 square metres of commercial GFA. Overall density of 4.6 times the area of the entire Newtonbrook redevelopment site. 254 vehicular parking spaces and 405 bicycle parking spaces are proposed. (see 20-209468 NNY 18 SA for phase 2). The Phase 3 land is part of a previous OPA/ZBA application (11 287471 NNY 24 OZ).

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

2591260 Ontario Inc.
SM25049 · 15 September 2017 · “5915 Yonge Street”
Cummer-Yonge Holdings Inc.
SM22017 · 9 July 2015 · “5915 Yonge Street”
Silvercore Inc.
SM21939 · 8 June 2015 · “5915 Yonge Street”
Silvercore Inc.
SM21647 · 10 April 2015 · “5915 Yonge Street”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 18

38 lobbied · 63 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=7
Matched, unlobbied100% n=3

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied21%
Matched, unlobbied15%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 18: 38 lobbied and 63 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	38	—	100% (n=7)	0%	21%	0.00
Matched, unlobbied	63	—	100% (n=3)	0%	15%	0.04

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.