Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 22 167486 STE 09 OZ
- Status
- Council Approved
- Approved
- Submitted
- 24 June 2022
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 1613 St Clair Ave W
- Ward
- Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
- Submitted
- 24 June 2022
- Status
- Council Approved
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 258 units
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
The developer intends to develop the subject lands with a 17-storey, 57 meter mixed-use building consisting of 258 units in 16,732 square meters of residential floor area and 1,404 square meters of non-residential floor area. Non-residential floor area would be comprised of 57square metres of community space, 271 square metres of retail, and 1,076 square metres of medical office. A total of 575.4 square meters of indoor amenity area and 721 square meters of outdoor amenity area is proposed. A Site Plan Control application has also been submitted in support of the proposal and has been circulated concurrently. The proposal has been revised to provide medical office space and community space noted above, simplified floor plates, relocation of parking to provide nine vehicle parking spaces above grade and 92 parking spaces below grade.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- MA Development Services Inc.SM37292 · 7 January 2026 · “1613 St. Clair Avenue West”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 9
19 lobbied · 28 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 19 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 28 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.