Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 22 140023 WET 07 OZ
360 Hullmar Dr; 4001 Steeles Ave W; 5000 Jane St
- Status
- Appeal Received
- In progress
- Submitted
- 29 April 2022
- Appealed
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 360 Hullmar Dr; 4001 Steeles Ave W; 5000 Jane St
- Ward
- Ward 7 · Anthony Perruzza
- Submitted
- 29 April 2022
- Status
- Appeal Received
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- Yes
- Size stated in the description
- 1,621 units; 109,193 m² gross floor area
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Zoning By-law Amendment (22 140023 WET 07 OZ) and Site Plan Control (22 140022 WET 07 SA) applications to facilitate an infill development. The applicant is proposing three new towers, measuring 35-storeys, 45-storeys, and 45-storeys. All three tower sit above an eight-storey podium. The proposed development, includes 1,621 new dwelling units, gross floor area of 109,193 square metres resulting in a density of 2.64 floor space index. The proposal would contain a total of 722 Parking spaces located within an underground garage. The three existing buildings on the subject site - two apartment buildings, measuring a 14 storeys and 17 storeys and a 2-storey comercial/amenity building - are proposed to be retained.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Sorbara Group of CompaniesSM25685 · 23 February 2018 · “360 HULLMAR DR.”
- Sorbara Group of CompaniesSM25685 · 23 February 2018 · “4001 STEELES AVE. W.”
- Sorbara Group of CompaniesSM25685 · 23 February 2018 · “5000 JANE ST.”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 7
7 lobbied · 8 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 7 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.