Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 22 132957 STE 12 SA

10 Raglan Ave; 12 Raglan Ave; 14 Raglan Ave; 16 Raglan Ave; 18 Raglan Ave; 20 Raglan Ave; 22 Raglan Ave; 24 Raglan Ave; 26 Raglan Ave; 28 Raglan Ave; 30 Raglan Ave; 32 Raglan Ave

Ward 12 · Josh MatlowDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: NOAC Issued; Approved
Submitted: 11 April 2022; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses: 10 Raglan Ave; 12 Raglan Ave; 14 Raglan Ave; 16 Raglan Ave; 18 Raglan Ave; 20 Raglan Ave; 22 Raglan Ave; 24 Raglan Ave; 26 Raglan Ave; 28 Raglan Ave; 30 Raglan Ave; 32 Raglan Ave
Ward: Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
Submitted: 11 April 2022
Status: NOAC Issued
Outcome recorded: Approved
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 440 units
Related file: 20 155716 STE 12 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Dec 2023 revised submission: proposes a 34-storey mixed use with a more slender podium, with no revision to the approved site specific GFA, requiring a Minor Variance approval (Application No. 23 231365 STE 12 MV).June 2023 revised submission: response to technical comments - minor changesNovember 2022 revised submission: Site Plan Approval application for a 28-storey mixed-use building including a 245 square metres community agency space, a 10 sq m micro-retail space and 440 residential dwelling units. A 252 sq m park is along the north end of the site and will be combined with a similarly sized approved park at 40 Raglan.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12

32 lobbied · 72 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=4
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied3%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12: 32 lobbied and 72 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	32	—	100% (n=4)	0%	3%	0.00
Matched, unlobbied	72	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.05

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.