Development application · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
Development application 22 130928 NNY 15 CD
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 5 April 2022
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
- Addresses
- 939 Eglinton Ave E
- Ward
- Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
- Submitted
- 5 April 2022
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 292 units
- Related file
- 17 278161 NNY 26 SA
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Draft Plan of Standard Condominium for a 21-storey mixed use building with 292 residential units, 314 residential parking spaces and 72 visitor parking spaces. The retail component is not part of this condominium application. Related planning applications include rezoning 15 141830 NNY 26 OZ, site plan approval 17 278161 NNY 26 SA, and consent approvals B007/19NY and B0049/19NY.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Camrost-FelcorpSM27655 · 15 February 2019 · “939 Eglinton Avenue East”
- Upper Eastside Building Group Inc.SM26550 · 24 July 2018 · “939 Eglinton Avenue East”
- DiamondcorpSM24267 · 26 March 2017 · “939 Eglinton Avenue East”
- Whitecastle New Urban Fund 2SM22499 · 17 November 2015 · “939 Eglinton Avenue East”
- Whitecastle New Urban Fund 2SM18293 · 25 July 2012 · “939 Eglinton Avenue East”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.