Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 22 124982 WET 07 SA
- Status
- OMB Approved
- Approved
- Submitted
- 21 March 2022
- Appealed
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 1 York Gate Blvd
- Ward
- Ward 7 · Anthony Perruzza
- Submitted
- 21 March 2022
- Status
- OMB Approved
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- Yes
- Size stated in the description
- 305 units
- Related file
- 22 116509 WET 07 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
**The OLT issued the Final Order on the ZBA appeal (OLT-23-000969) and adjourned the site plan appeal (OLT-23-000970). The site plan appeal is currently in the OLT's 'closed file status' list as the applicant has not made any progress. When the site plan re-activates, the City cannot issue NOAC until the applicant withdraws the site plan appeal, or the site plan appeal is otherwise resolved with the OLT.** The application proposes one new tower 27-storeys in height, with a total of 305 residential units. The tower is located in the western portion of a site that is already developed with an existing shopping plaza and surface parking lot. The existing private driveway to the shopping plaza will also provide access to the tower and its associated surface parking and pick-up and drop-off areas from York Gate Boulevard in the west. A new POPS is proposed south of the tower that will connect to future public realm elements envisioned for the block through the Jane Finch Secondary Plan.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 7
5 lobbied · 28 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 5 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 28 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.