Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 21 249739 STE 14 SA
72 Chester Hill Rd; 954 Broadview Ave; 956 Broadview Ave; 958 Broadview Ave
- Status
- Under Review
- In progress
- Submitted
- 17 December 2021
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 72 Chester Hill Rd; 954 Broadview Ave; 956 Broadview Ave; 958 Broadview Ave
- Ward
- Ward 14 · Paula Fletcher
- Submitted
- 17 December 2021
- Status
- Under Review
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 310 units
- Related file
- 18 118403 STE 29 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Site Plan approval application to permit the construction of a 26 storey mixed use building with a 4 storey component extending to the rear of the property. There development includes 310 dwelling units, the restoration of a heritage building and a public park. The policy framework to support this proposal is under review under file # 25 219 469 STE 14 OZ.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Revera Inc.SM27204 · 1 January 2019 · “958 Broadview Avenue.”
- Estonian House in Toronto Ltd.SM23508 · 8 September 2016 · “958 Broadview Ave.”
- Alterra Properties IncSM22814 · 22 February 2016 · “958 Broadview Ave.”
- Tribute CommunitiesSM21385 · 4 February 2015 · “958 Broadview Avenue”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 14
17 lobbied · 35 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 35 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.