Development application · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)

Development application 21 249581 NNY 15 CD

15 Strathgowan Ave; 17 Strathgowan Ave; 19 Strathgowan Ave; 21 Strathgowan Ave; 2779 Yonge St; 2781 Yonge St

Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos LinDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 17 December 2021; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
Addresses: 15 Strathgowan Ave; 17 Strathgowan Ave; 19 Strathgowan Ave; 21 Strathgowan Ave; 2779 Yonge St; 2781 Yonge St
Ward: Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
Submitted: 17 December 2021
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 61 units
Related file: 13 123068 NNY 25 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Draft Plan of Standard Condominium to permit 61 market residential units and 116 underground residential vehicular parking spaces in a mixed-use and mixed-tenure building. Related planning applications include rezoning 13 123068 NNY 25 OZ and site plan approval 18 123995 NNY 25 SA.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Devron (YS) Ltd.
SM34751 · 25 August 2023 · “2781 Yonge St.”
Devron (YS) Ltd.
SM30563 · 16 September 2020 · “2779 Yonge Street”
Devron (YS) Ltd.
SM24937 · 10 August 2017 · “2781 Yonge Street”
Bianca Pollak
SM19771 · 17 October 2013 · “2779 Yonge St”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Data table· 2 rows

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	28	—	100% (n=3)	0%	0%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	95	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.