Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 21 245533 STE 14 SA
2 Mortimer Ave; 4 Mortimer Ave; 995 Broadview Ave; 999 Broadview Ave; 1001 Broadview Ave; 1003 Broadview Ave; 1005 Broadview Ave
- Status
- NOAC Issued
- Approved
- Submitted
- 6 December 2021
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 2 Mortimer Ave; 4 Mortimer Ave; 995 Broadview Ave; 999 Broadview Ave; 1001 Broadview Ave; 1003 Broadview Ave; 1005 Broadview Ave
- Ward
- Ward 14 · Paula Fletcher
- Submitted
- 6 December 2021
- Status
- NOAC Issued
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 50 units; 5,720 m² gross floor area
- Related file
- 17 266470 STE 29 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
The site plan approval application proposes to construct a 7 storey mixed use building having a gross floor area of approximately 5,720 square metres, including 394 square metres of ground floor commercial space with a density of 3.74 times the area of the lot. The proposal includes 50 residential dwelling units, 65 vehicle parking spaces in two underground levels and 77 bicycle spaces.levels. This file is related to the Official Plan and zoning by-law amendment application 17 266470 STE 29 OZ . The policy and zoning to support this proposal has been approved in principle by the Ontario Lands Tribunal (OLT), Case No. PL180429.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Gordian Hospitality Corp.SM25669 · 1 January 2018 · “1001 Broadview Avenue”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 14
17 lobbied · 35 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 35 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.