Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 21 235816 WET 07 OZ
11 Catford Rd; 20 Broadoaks Dr
- Status
- OMB Approved
- Approved
- Submitted
- 9 November 2021
- Appealed
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 11 Catford Rd; 20 Broadoaks Dr
- Ward
- Ward 7 · Anthony Perruzza
- Submitted
- 9 November 2021
- Status
- OMB Approved
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- Yes
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application topermit the redevelopment of the site with two four-storeyresidential townhouse blocks, a 12-storey mixed use building,and 18- and 30-storey residential towers connected by a six-storey base building. The existing apartment buildings located at 11 Catford Road and 20 Broadoaks Drive would be maintained.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Sorbara Group of CompaniesSM25682 · 23 February 2018 · “11 CATFORD RD.”
- Sorbara Group of CompaniesSM25682 · 23 February 2018 · “20 BROADOAKS DR.”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 7
7 lobbied · 8 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 7 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.