Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 21 235229 NNY 08 OZ

4 Ramsden Rd; 6 Ramsden Rd; 10 Ramsden Rd; 2402 Dufferin St; 2404 Dufferin St; 2406 Dufferin St; 2408 Dufferin St; 2418 Dufferin St

Ward 8 · Mike ColleDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: OMB Appeal; In progress
Submitted: 8 November 2021; Appealed
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 4 Ramsden Rd; 6 Ramsden Rd; 10 Ramsden Rd; 2402 Dufferin St; 2404 Dufferin St; 2406 Dufferin St; 2408 Dufferin St; 2418 Dufferin St
Ward: Ward 8 · Mike Colle
Submitted: 8 November 2021
Status: OMB Appeal
Outcome recorded: In progress
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: Yes
Size stated in the description: 405 units; 883 m² gross floor area

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Zoning by-law amendment to facilitate the redevelopment of the site for a 24-storey mixed use building and a 9-storey apartment building. the proposed total non-residential gross floor area is 883 square metres, and the proposed residential gross floor area is 29053. A total of 405 units are proposed.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Cenith Developments Inc.
SM23891 · 12 January 2017 · “10 Ramsden Rd.”
Cenith Developments Inc.
SM23878 · 10 January 2017 · “2418 Dufferin St.”
Cenith Developments Inc.
SM23878 · 10 January 2017 · “10 Ramsden Rd.”
Cenith Developments Inc.
SM22140 · 19 August 2015 · “2418 Dufferin St.”
Can-Alm Inc., Ms. Nancy So
SM12222 · 8 September 2008 · “2418 Dufferin Street”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8

33 lobbied · 57 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=3

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied26%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8: 33 lobbied and 57 matched unlobbied applications in 22 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	33	—	100% (n=3)	0%	12%	0.00
Matched, unlobbied	57	—	100% (n=3)	0%	26%	0.03

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.