Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 21 233790 STE 11 SA

Ward 11 · Dianne SaxeDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: NOAC Issued; Approved
Submitted: 3 November 2021; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses: 25 Mc Murrich St; 906 Yonge St
Ward: Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
Submitted: 3 November 2021
Status: NOAC Issued
Outcome recorded: Approved
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 410 units; 760 m² gross floor area
Related file: 21 233780 STE 11 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Site Plan Approval for a 40-storey and 23-storey building, containing a combined total of 410 dwelling units and 760 square metres of non-residential gross floor area.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Easton's Group of Hotels
SM35401 · 14 March 2024 · “906 Yonge Street”
Easton's/Gupta Group
SM34805 · 12 September 2023 · “906 Yonge Street”
906 Yonge Street Development Inc.
SM34750 · 24 August 2023 · “906 Yonge Street”
Easton's Group
SM33368 · 10 June 2022 · “906 Yonge Street”
Easton's Group
SM32089 · 22 July 2021 · “906 Yonge St”
Easton's Group
SM32058 · 19 July 2021 · “906 Yonge Street”
1293446 Ontario Inc.
SM32019 · 9 July 2021 · “906 Yonge Street”
Easton's Group
SM31954 · 30 June 2021 · “906 Yonge Street”
MTCC #562 and MTCC #698
SM19658 · 9 September 2013 · “906 Yonge Street”
Ridpath
SM16015 · 2 March 2011 · “906 Yonge St.”
One-Ten Yorkville Limited
SM14168 · 22 February 2010 · “906 Yonge Street”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11

46 lobbied · 113 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied1,629

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=2
Matched, unlobbied100% n=12

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied9%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=61
Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11: 46 lobbied and 113 matched unlobbied applications in 26 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	46	—	100% (n=2)	0%	9%	0.09
Matched, unlobbied	113	1,629	100% (n=12)	0%	2%	0.02

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=61)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,237	727	97% (n=96)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.