Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 21 226317 STE 13 SA

157 Princess St; 254 King St E; 256 King St E; 260 King St E; 266 King St E; 427 Adelaide St E; 435 Adelaide St E

Ward 13 · Chris MoiseDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Under Review; In progress
Submitted: 15 October 2021; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses: 157 Princess St; 254 King St E; 256 King St E; 260 King St E; 266 King St E; 427 Adelaide St E; 435 Adelaide St E
Ward: Ward 13 · Chris Moise
Submitted: 15 October 2021
Status: Under Review
Outcome recorded: In progress
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 819 units; 62,695 m² gross floor area
Related file: 16 232831 STE 28 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Site Plan Approval for two mixed-use towers having heights of 38 and 40 storeys. The proposed non-residential gross floor area is 5,490 square metres, and the proposed residential gross floor area is 62,695 square metres. A total of 819 rental dwelling units are proposed.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Fitzrovia Residential Inc.
SM34046 · 16 January 2023 · “260 King Street East.”
SAS Institute (Canada) Inc.
SM26118 · 27 April 2018 · “260 King St E”
Northam Realty Advisors Limited
SM25844 · 13 March 2018 · “260 King Street East”
SAS Institute (Canada) Inc.
SM25708 · 1 March 2018 · “254 King Street East”
SAS Instittue (Canada) Inc.
SM25663 · 14 February 2018 · “254 King Street East”
Northam Realty Advisors Limited
SM23628 · 18 October 2016 · “260 King Street East”
Northam Realty Advisors Limited
SM23629 · 18 October 2016 · “260 King Street East”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13

56 lobbied · 128 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=5
Matched, unlobbied100% n=8

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied7%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13: 56 lobbied and 128 matched unlobbied applications in 32 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	56	—	100% (n=5)	0%	7%	0.16
Matched, unlobbied	128	—	100% (n=8)	0%	2%	0.01

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.